Bureaucratic Leadership Easy Definition

Because food safety is such an important issue, a bureaucratic leadership style is best suited. In addition, much of the analysis focused on the conditions and elements required for the effective work of bureaucratic leaders. He outlined six principles that are crucial to the framework. The business world has also provided examples of bureaucratic leaders, and Harold Geneen is one of those figures. He has drawn most of his success as CEO of the International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (ITT), which he developed into a multinational conglomerate. Much of his success was due to his concentration and bureaucratic leadership style. In addition, within the system, people are assigned to the roles that best suit their abilities, and the bureaucratic framework requires continuous development of the leader and subordinates. Because of these requirements, systems tend to focus on rules, laws, and regulations as the basis for performance and functionality. Bureaucratic leadership is based on a clear line of command, strict regulations, and follower compliance. It is characterized by the application of a set of management and decision-making rules, as well as by official functions established within a hierarchy of power. The term bureaucracy reveals some of the essential characteristics of the leadership model. The Cambridge Dictionary defines the word as follows: Have you ever noticed that there seem to be so many different ways of leading people that there are great leaders? If we recall the successes of Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Napoleon Bonaparte to Steve Jobs and Jack Welch, we also find that they all used different approaches adapted to their specific situations and circumstances.

Over the past century, researchers and psychologists have developed simple ways to describe “leadership styles,” and in this section we will explore these well-known leadership styles. Cooper, D. (2015). Effective Safety Management: Understand the types and styles that improve safety performance. Workplace Safety, 60, 49-53. Team members must perform tasks in the manner determined by the organization and its rules. This compliance with the rules considerably stifles creativity, because thinking outside the box is not desirable. Productivity suffers because team members spend more time responding to requirements instead of coming up with new ideas on how to accomplish their tasks better, smarter, and faster. This low level of freedom and suppression of creativity can reduce team morale and lead to high employee turnover. Consider democratic leadership or even laissez-faire leadership if you want to maximize creativity. (You can read about them and other styles in our leadership style portal.) The supervisor was only one step in the bureaucratic chain.

Harold Geneen was a student with a passion for leadership and he also spent time writing about it. He once said, “Leadership is not practiced so much in words as in attitude and deeds. The quote reflects the idea of bureaucratic leadership to focus on organization and performance, not on individual achievements or characteristics. This leadership style can be beneficial in highly regulated industries, institutions, and government entities that involve a rigid structure that operates according to defined rigid rules. This can be an effective management style in companies that don`t require much originality or inventiveness on the part of employees. Overall, the bureaucratic management system can provide extremely reliable results. It ensures that procedures do not stagnate under pressure and ensures that everyone in the organization is informed of processes and goals. Essentially, it provides organizations with better direction and a clearly defined roadmap for success. If you want consistency, then the bureaucratic framework can provide it. The established structures and rules greatly facilitate the introduction of new subordinates. Overall, the leadership framework is ideal for organizations that perform highly repeatable tasks. In the case of the fast food industry and McDonaldization theory, you can see how the bureaucratic engine can boost the organization in terms of achieving goals.

It will be easy for new subordinates to become familiar with the role, as expectations and procedures are clearly defined. Despite the pejorative view of bureaucracy, it was an important part of the societies that functioned. Throughout their history, bureaucratic systems have been reformed and restructured, often with little influence. Perhaps the theorization of bureaucracy was almost inevitable. In addition, he distinguished two types of leadership: transformative, which would include charismatic leadership, and transactional, which refers to bureaucratic leaders. The obvious differences between these two types are well illustrated in the following table: According to Weber, bureaucratization was also an integral part of rational and legal authority, and he believed that it played a key role in the success of Western society. He said, “Bureaucratic administration essentially means dominating through knowledge.” Although he didn`t necessarily think it was the best style of leadership, he still considered it an indispensable part of the modern world. For example, when it comes to government organizations, bureaucratic leadership has additional significance.

Next Steps

We hope you prayerfully consider NorthCreek and encourage you to take the proper steps in applying for our school. 

NorthCreek Academy and Preschool admits students of any race, color, national and ethnic origin to all the rights, privileges, programs, and activities generally accorded or made available to students at the school. It does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, or national and ethnic origin in administration of its educational policies, admissions policies, financial aid programs, and athletic and other school-administered programs.